Review



gaussian filter applied post reconstruction  (GE Healthcare)


Bioz Verified Symbol GE Healthcare is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    GE Healthcare gaussian filter applied post reconstruction
    Gaussian Filter Applied Post Reconstruction, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 104333 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian filter applied post reconstruction/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 99 stars, based on 104333 article reviews
    gaussian filter applied post reconstruction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    GE Healthcare gaussian filter applied post reconstruction
    Gaussian Filter Applied Post Reconstruction, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian filter applied post reconstruction/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gaussian filter applied post reconstruction - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    GE Healthcare fwhm post reconstruction gaussian filter size
    Parameter sets used for listmode data reconstructions
    Fwhm Post Reconstruction Gaussian Filter Size, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fwhm post reconstruction gaussian filter size/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fwhm post reconstruction gaussian filter size - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    GE Healthcare post reconstruction gaussian filter width
    Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68
    Post Reconstruction Gaussian Filter Width, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/post reconstruction gaussian filter width/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    post reconstruction gaussian filter width - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    GE Healthcare post reconstruction gaussian filter
    Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68
    Post Reconstruction Gaussian Filter, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/post reconstruction gaussian filter/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    post reconstruction gaussian filter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    GE Healthcare gaussian post reconstruction filter
    Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68
    Gaussian Post Reconstruction Filter, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian post reconstruction filter/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gaussian post reconstruction filter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Parameter sets used for listmode data reconstructions

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Yttrium-90 quantitative phantom study using digital photon counting PET

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00402-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Parameter sets used for listmode data reconstructions

    Article Snippet: In 2018, Siman et al. [ ] studied a GE D690 PET/CT and found that 3 iterations with 12 subsets with additional PSF modelling and a 5.2 mm FWHM post-reconstruction Gaussian filter size provided the least root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) between their experimental and reference DVH.

    Techniques:

    RMSD between \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$DVH_{pet}^{VSV}$\end{document} DV H pet VSV and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$DVH_{ref}^{MC}$\end{document} DV H ref MC . A RMSD for all reconstructions for the 28-mm sphere against filter size. B RMSD against sphere sizes for reconstructions using a 2-mm FWHM post-reconstruction Gaussian filter only

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Yttrium-90 quantitative phantom study using digital photon counting PET

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00402-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RMSD between \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$DVH_{pet}^{VSV}$\end{document} DV H pet VSV and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$DVH_{ref}^{MC}$\end{document} DV H ref MC . A RMSD for all reconstructions for the 28-mm sphere against filter size. B RMSD against sphere sizes for reconstructions using a 2-mm FWHM post-reconstruction Gaussian filter only

    Article Snippet: In 2018, Siman et al. [ ] studied a GE D690 PET/CT and found that 3 iterations with 12 subsets with additional PSF modelling and a 5.2 mm FWHM post-reconstruction Gaussian filter size provided the least root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) between their experimental and reference DVH.

    Techniques:

    Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00400-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68

    Article Snippet: Fig. 2 RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Techniques:

    Surface plots for the 37-mm sphere of the NEMA IQ phantom taken from the slice with the largest diameter. The top row refers to BPL reconstructions with increasing penalisation factor (left to right) and the bottom row to PSF reconstructions with increasing width (left to right) of Gaussian post-reconstruction filter. The averaged peak-to-valley ratios from six profiles are also shown on the right for BPL (top) and PSF (bottom) reconstructions for the 37-, 28-, and 22-mm spheres. The error bars represent the standard deviations.

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00400-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface plots for the 37-mm sphere of the NEMA IQ phantom taken from the slice with the largest diameter. The top row refers to BPL reconstructions with increasing penalisation factor (left to right) and the bottom row to PSF reconstructions with increasing width (left to right) of Gaussian post-reconstruction filter. The averaged peak-to-valley ratios from six profiles are also shown on the right for BPL (top) and PSF (bottom) reconstructions for the 37-, 28-, and 22-mm spheres. The error bars represent the standard deviations.

    Article Snippet: Fig. 2 RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Techniques:

    RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00400-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Article Snippet: Fig. 2 RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Techniques:

    Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00400-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Reconstruction and acquisition parameters for all NEMA IQ scans using Fluorine-18 and Gallium-68

    Article Snippet: To investigate this effect, the NEMA IQ phantom was scanned on the GE-710 (1) scanner with sphere-to-background ratios ranging from 2:1 to 15:1, reconstructed using OSEM with time-of-flight and smoothed with a post-reconstruction Gaussian filter of 6.4 mm.

    Techniques:

    Surface plots for the 37-mm sphere of the NEMA IQ phantom taken from the slice with the largest diameter. The top row refers to BPL reconstructions with increasing penalisation factor (left to right) and the bottom row to PSF reconstructions with increasing width (left to right) of Gaussian post-reconstruction filter. The averaged peak-to-valley ratios from six profiles are also shown on the right for BPL (top) and PSF (bottom) reconstructions for the 37-, 28-, and 22-mm spheres. The error bars represent the standard deviations.

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00400-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface plots for the 37-mm sphere of the NEMA IQ phantom taken from the slice with the largest diameter. The top row refers to BPL reconstructions with increasing penalisation factor (left to right) and the bottom row to PSF reconstructions with increasing width (left to right) of Gaussian post-reconstruction filter. The averaged peak-to-valley ratios from six profiles are also shown on the right for BPL (top) and PSF (bottom) reconstructions for the 37-, 28-, and 22-mm spheres. The error bars represent the standard deviations.

    Article Snippet: To investigate this effect, the NEMA IQ phantom was scanned on the GE-710 (1) scanner with sphere-to-background ratios ranging from 2:1 to 15:1, reconstructed using OSEM with time-of-flight and smoothed with a post-reconstruction Gaussian filter of 6.4 mm.

    Techniques:

    RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Journal: EJNMMI Physics

    Article Title: Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials

    doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00400-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RC max (left), RC mean (middle) and RC peak (right) for Gallium-68 measured from the NEMA IQ phantom scanned on a GE Discovery 710 scanner and reconstructed using BPL with varying penalisation factor (top row) and PSF with varying post-reconstruction Gaussian filter width (bottom row).

    Article Snippet: To investigate this effect, the NEMA IQ phantom was scanned on the GE-710 (1) scanner with sphere-to-background ratios ranging from 2:1 to 15:1, reconstructed using OSEM with time-of-flight and smoothed with a post-reconstruction Gaussian filter of 6.4 mm.

    Techniques: